Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com" <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "euler(at)eulerto(dot)com" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com" <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br" <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Date: 2023-02-03 11:52:27
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KgGXpNYmuwfyUFRYx1Xbs-itNKGgiO17d2N8-78q-XNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:12 PM wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here is a comment:
>
> 1. The checks in function AlterSubscription
> + /*
> + * The combination of parallel streaming mode and
> + * min_apply_delay is not allowed. See
> + * parse_subscription_options for details of the reason.
> + */
> + if (opts.streaming == LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL)
> + if ((IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_MIN_APPLY_DELAY) && opts.min_apply_delay > 0) ||
> + (!IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_MIN_APPLY_DELAY) && sub->minapplydelay > 0))
> and
> + /*
> + * The combination of parallel streaming mode and
> + * min_apply_delay is not allowed.
> + */
> + if (opts.min_apply_delay > 0)
> + if ((IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_STREAMING) && opts.streaming == LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL) ||
> + (!IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_STREAMING) && sub->stream == LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL))
>
> I think the case where the options "min_apply_delay>0" and "streaming=parallel"
> are set at the same time seems to have been checked in the function
> parse_subscription_options, how about simplifying these two if-statements here
> to the following:
> ```
> if (opts.streaming == LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL &&
> !IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_MIN_APPLY_DELAY) &&
> sub->minapplydelay > 0)
>
> and
>
> if (opts.min_apply_delay > 0 &&
> !IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_STREAMING) &&
> sub->stream == LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL)
> ```
>

Won't just checking if ((opts.streaming == LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL
&& sub->minapplydelay > 0) || (opts.min_apply_delay > 0 && sub->stream
== LOGICALREP_STREAM_PARALLEL)) be sufficient in that case?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-02-03 12:08:48 RE: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2023-02-03 10:41:29 proposal: psql: psql variable BACKEND_PID