| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Date: | 2024-02-22 11:53:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KcQSk7wzC7Zfrth9OhrjW2HvxL4tKgU42qqH7p6jn+FA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:35 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:01:34PM +0530, shveta malik wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 3:44 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> > <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Some random comments about v92_001 (Sorry if it has already been discussed
> > > up-thread):
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. The patch is pushed 15 minutes back.
>
> Yeah, saw that after I send the comments ;-)
>
There is a BF failure. See
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prion&dt=2024-02-22%2010%3A13%3A03.
The initial analysis suggests that for some reason, the primary went
down after the slot sync worker was invoked the first time. See the
below in the primary's LOG:
2024-02-22 10:59:56.896 UTC [2721639:29] standby1_slotsync worker LOG:
00000: statement: SELECT slot_name, plugin, confirmed_flush_lsn,
restart_lsn, catalog_xmin, two_phase, failover, database,
conflict_reason FROM pg_catalog.pg_replication_slots WHERE failover
and NOT temporary
2024-02-22 10:59:56.896 UTC [2721639:30] standby1_slotsync worker
LOCATION: exec_simple_query, postgres.c:1070
2024-02-22 11:00:26.967 UTC [2721639:31] standby1_slotsync worker LOG:
00000: statement: SELECT slot_name, plugin, confirmed_flush_lsn,
restart_lsn, catalog_xmin, two_phase, failover, database,
conflict_reason FROM pg_catalog.pg_replication_slots WHERE failover
and NOT temporary
2024-02-22 11:00:26.967 UTC [2721639:32] standby1_slotsync worker
LOCATION: exec_simple_query, postgres.c:1070
2024-02-22 11:00:35.908 UTC [2721435:309] LOG: 00000: received
immediate shutdown request
2024-02-22 11:00:35.908 UTC [2721435:310] LOCATION:
process_pm_shutdown_request, postmaster.c:2859
2024-02-22 11:00:35.911 UTC [2721435:311] LOG: 00000: database system
is shut down
2024-02-22 11:00:35.911 UTC [2721435:312] LOCATION: UnlinkLockFiles,
miscinit.c:1138
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Zhilin | 2024-02-22 12:01:36 | Re: When extended query protocol ends? |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-02-22 11:46:26 | Re: Avoid stack frame setup in performance critical routines using tail calls |