Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Date: 2022-09-06 08:45:22
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K_kPs+nLW8DGzRnm5T+h0gzktjYHe3yKpyoyJ9OOYSEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:08 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> You are right - that REFRESH PUBLICATION was not necessary for this
> example. The patch is modified to use your suggested text.
>
> PSA v8
>

LGTM. I'll push this once the tag appears for v15.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-09-06 08:54:35 Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2022-09-06 08:40:28 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits