From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Pirotte <dpirotte(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? |
Date: | 2021-04-07 05:20:50 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KT5a6Z+mjphT5ZaMn78eD6RcHRWWcsAkNPiWgUooeqfw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 5:45 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, at 4:06 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> I have made few minor changes in the attached. (a) Initialize the
> streaming message callback API, (b) update docs to reflect that XID
> can be sent for streaming of in-progress transactions, I see that the
> same information needs to be updated for a few other protocol message
> but we can do that as a separate patch (c) slightly tweaked the commit
> messages
>
> Good catch. I completely forgot the streaming of in progress transactions. I
> agree that the documentation for transaction should be added as a separate
> patch since the scope is beyond this feature.
>
I have pushed this work and updated the CF entry accordingly.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-04-07 05:22:22 | RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-04-07 05:03:50 | Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions |