From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file |
Date: | 2015-06-06 03:08:53 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KRPRx6-h+tO4G-hTJoD_m_vUsHw_LpOAf2KYjUbT9gvg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06/04/2015 11:35 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Theoretically, I don't see much problem by changing the checks
>>> way you have done in patch, but it becomes different than what
>>> we have in destroy_tablespace_directories() and it is slightly
>>> changing the way check was originally done in
>>> create_tablespace_directories(), basically original check will try
>>> unlink if lstat returns non-zero return code. If you want to proceed
>>> with the changed checks as in v3, then may be we can modify
>>> comments on top of function remove_tablespace_symlink() which
>>> indicates that it works like destroy_tablespace_directories().
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The difference is that here we're getting the list from a base backup and
>> it seems to me the risk of having a file we don't really want to unlink is
>> significantly greater.
>>
>
> Okay, I think I can understand why you want to be cautious for
> having a different check for this path, but in that case there is a
> chance that recovery might fail when it will try to create a symlink
> for that file. Shouldn't we then try to call this new function only
> when we are trying to restore from tablespace_map file and also
> is there a need of ifdef S_ISLINK in remove_tablespace_link?
>
Shall I send an updated patch on these lines or do you want to
proceed with v3 version?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-07 19:32:44 | pgsql: Use a safer method for determining whether relcache init file is |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-05 21:04:12 | pgsql: Get rid of a //-style comment. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-06-06 04:51:04 | Re: could not truncate directory "pg_subtrans": apparent wraparound |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-06-06 03:07:08 | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |