Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date: 2021-11-19 03:51:52
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KKGtU8RedXA5sBZ7Mb_X5-+9VRakC48yTir_9zR2zRxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:10 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:45 PM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 16, 2021 2:31 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Right. I've fixed this issue and attached an updated patch.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for your patch.
> >
> > I read the discussion about stats entries for table sync worker[1], the
> > statistics are retained after table sync worker finished its jobs and user can remove
> > them via pg_stat_reset_subscription_worker function.
> >
> > But I notice that, if a table sync worker finished its jobs, the error reported by
> > this worker will not be shown in the pg_stat_subscription_workers view. (It seemed caused by this condition: "WHERE srsubstate <> 'r'") Is it intentional? I think this may cause a result that users don't know the statistics are still exist, and won't remove the statistics manually. And that is not friendly to users' storage, right?
> >
>
> You're right. The condition "WHERE substate <> 'r') should be removed.
> I'll do that change in the next version patch. Thanks!
>

One more thing you might want to consider for the next version is
whether to rename the columns as discussed in the related thread [1]?
I think we should consider future work and name them accordingly.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KR41bRUuPeNBSGv2%2Bq7ROKukS3myeAUqrZMD8MEwR0DQ%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-11-19 03:59:15 add missing errdetail for xlogreader allocation failure error
Previous Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-11-19 02:25:29 RE: parallel vacuum comments