Re: commitfest status

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest status
Date: 2014-07-31 06:45:01
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KJWmT2MsGOj53G47H1pjf6K5GEeHsDgNaddpvf1tBhCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anybody working on closing out the "in progress" CommitFest?
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=22

If you or others don't have any objection, then I will do this on
coming weekend.

> I think anything that is "waiting on author" should certainly be
> bounced at this point, and stuff that never got reviewed

In past, I have seen that we try to make sure that each patch
gets atleast one review in CF, so do you think we should try
that this time as well (I think patches which don't have even one
review are not too many). To be honest, I don't have any concrete
plan to make that happen except for identifying such patches and
request on list for a review of those patches or may be try to review
myself for one or more of those.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-07-31 06:45:20 Re: Production block comparison facility
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-07-31 06:38:48 Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup