Re: logical_replication_mode

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical_replication_mode
Date: 2023-08-29 08:21:27
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KJ3OdEufqrKZys4nttw9oZBRR2342EvN4bpfReaM9NXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:56 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I had a look at the patch 0001.
>
> It looks OK to me, but here are a couple of comments:
>
> ======
>
> 1. Is this fix intended for PG16?
>

Yes.

> I found some mention of this GUC old name lurking in the release v16 notes [1].
>

That should be changed as well but we can do that as a separate patch
just for v16.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-08-29 08:43:39 Re: tablecmds.c/MergeAttributes() cleanup
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-29 07:39:51 Re: Wrong usage of pqMsg_Close message code?