Re: Doc: fix the note related to the GUC "synchronized_standby_slots"

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Masao(dot)Fujii(at)nttdata(dot)com
Subject: Re: Doc: fix the note related to the GUC "synchronized_standby_slots"
Date: 2024-08-27 03:19:43
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K9+49uGODxnhZmJFXqi0wLT3+pxwcrzo0Hd-uT=S-fsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:30 PM <Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> When I read the following documentation related to the "synchronized_standby_slots", I misunderstood that data loss would not occur in the case of synchronous physical replication. However, this is incorrect (see reproduce.txt).
>

I think you see such a behavior because you have disabled
'synchronized_standby_slots' in your script (# disable
"synchronized_standby_slots"). You need to enable that to avoid data
loss. Considering that, I don't think your proposed text is an
improvement.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-08-27 03:20:57 Re: Doc: fix the note related to the GUC "synchronized_standby_slots"
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-08-27 02:58:58 Re: Collect statistics about conflicts in logical replication