Re: Doc: fix the note related to the GUC "synchronized_standby_slots"

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Masao(dot)Fujii(at)nttdata(dot)com
Subject: Re: Doc: fix the note related to the GUC "synchronized_standby_slots"
Date: 2024-08-27 08:45:05
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K8ALC29mCm_j6vkMaFK6DaynqtUkhYAu9-oXu1ZhprwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:18 AM <Masahiro(dot)Ikeda(at)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think you see such a behavior because you have disabled 'synchronized_standby_slots'
> > in your script (# disable "synchronized_standby_slots"). You need to enable that to
> > avoid data loss. Considering that, I don't think your proposed text is an improvement.
> Yes, I know.
>
> As David said, "without losing data" makes me confused because there are three patterns that users
> think the data was lost though there may be other cases.
>

So, will it be okay if we just remove ".. without losing data" from
the sentence? Will that avoid the confusion you have?

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2024-08-27 08:56:44 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Previous Message Andy Fan 2024-08-27 08:43:45 Re: New function normal_rand_array function to contrib/tablefunc.