From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neha Sharma <neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
Date: | 2020-09-01 04:01:38 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K7HvhJ4w5B4PorY_mwJyBDFi_K050LjNCGAipkJQQrNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:27 PM Neha Sharma
<neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit/Dilip,
>
> I have tested a few scenarios on top of the v56 patches, where the replication worker still had few subtransactions in uncommitted state and we restart the publisher server.
> No crash or data discrepancies were observed, attached are the test scenarios verified.
>
Thanks, I have pushed the fix
(https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ab77697f67aa5b90b032b9175b46901859da6d7)
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-01 04:41:04 | Re: Include access method in listTables output |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-09-01 03:58:34 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |