From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Comment typo in tableam.h |
Date: | 2019-07-10 11:50:26 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K2DFkTYviEAU_Bobgz+o3o1DfgLchfNg8hkmpt=oda-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:21 PM Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 12:05 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:00 AM Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>> > Please find attached v2 of patch 1 without objectionable comment change. v1 of patch 2 attaching here just for convenience, no modifications made to it.
>> >
>>
>> 0001*
>> * See table_index_fetch_tuple's comment about what the difference between
>> - * these functions is. This function is the correct to use outside of
>> - * index entry->table tuple lookups.
>> + * these functions is. This function is correct to use outside of index
>> + * entry->table tuple lookups.
>>
>> How about if we write the last line of comment as "It is correct to
>> use this function outside of index entry->table tuple lookups."? I am
>> not an expert on this matter, but I find the way I am suggesting
>> easier to read.
>
>
> I am fine with the way you have suggested.
>
Pushed. I have already pushed your other patch a few days back. So,
as per my knowledge, we are done here. Do, let me know if anything
proposed in this thread is pending?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2019-07-10 12:25:27 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2019-07-10 11:43:11 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |