From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Passing query string to workers |
Date: | 2017-02-10 13:48:09 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K1hbJQ5ED-6i-ZCOfoqWKBEm=_QjH=sDy+ZzKU-1A9FQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Rafia Sabih
> <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks a lot Kuntal for the review, please find attached patch for the
>> revised version.
> Few comments on the patch:
>
> There are some spacing issues in the code. For example,
> + estate->es_queryString = (char
> *)palloc0(strlen(queryDesc->sourceText) + 1);
> + /*Estimate space for query text. */
> pgindent might be helpful to track all such changes.
>
> +#define PARALLEL_KEY_QUERY_TEXT UINT64CONST(0xE000000000000010)
> I'm uncomfortable with declaring the same macro in two
> files(parallel.c, execParallel.c). My suggestion would be to move
> pgstat_report_activity in ParallelQueryMain instead of
> ParallelWorkerMain. Then, you can remove the macro definition from
> parallel.c. Thoughts?
>
Yes, I also don't see any need of defining it in parallel.c. I think
she has kept to report it in pg_stat_activity, but I feel that code
can also be moved to execParallel.c.
Another question is don't we need to set debug_query_string in worker?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2017-02-10 13:56:59 | Re: removing tsearch2 |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-02-10 13:12:19 | Re: Parameterization of partial path |