From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution |
Date: | 2024-08-30 06:42:56 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K0cuL0JH2FAby=epzz7XRAtCqdFANFU_=37Tx=k6sTWA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:58 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:30 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> 2)
> >> Currently pg_dump is dumping even the default resolvers configuration.
> >> As an example if I have not changed default configuration for say
> >> sub1, it still dumps all:
> >>
> >> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1 CONNECTION '..' PUBLICATION pub1 WITH (....)
> >> CONFLICT RESOLVER (insert_exists = 'error', update_differ =
> >> 'apply_remote', update_exists = 'error', update_missing = 'skip',
> >> delete_differ = 'apply_remote', delete_missing = 'skip');
> >>
> >> I am not sure if we need to dump default resolvers. Would like to know
> >> what others think on this.
> >>
Normally, we don't add defaults in the dumped command. For example,
dumpSubscription won't dump the options where the default is
unchanged. We shouldn't do it unless we have a reason for dumping
defaults.
> >> 3)
> >> Why in 002_pg_dump.pl we have default resolvers set explicitly?
> >>
> > In 003_pg_dump.pl, default resolvers are not set explicitly, that is the regexp to check the pg_dump generated command for creating subscriptions. This is again connected to your 2nd question.
>
> Okay so we may not need this change if we plan to *not *dump defaults
> in pg_dump.
>
> Another point about 'defaults' is regarding insertion into the
> pg_subscription_conflict table. We currently do insert default
> resolvers into 'pg_subscription_conflict' even if the user has not
> explicitly configured them.
>
I don't see any problem with it. BTW, if we don't do it, I think
wherever we are referring the resolvers for a conflict, we need some
special handling for default and non-default. Am I missing something?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2024-08-30 06:45:41 | RE: Collect statistics about conflicts in logical replication |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-08-30 06:36:01 | Re: list of acknowledgments for PG17 |