| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reload configuration more frequently in apply worker. |
| Date: | 2023-06-07 05:53:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Jw8-Wk8nEPpSP8J=35ghSkBEAG82HfPANpv0Y9acpLTA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 7:45 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, June 5, 2023 8:03 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am able to reproduce the problem with the script and steps mentioned by
> > you. The patch provided by you fixes the problem and looks good to me. I'll
> > push this by Wednesday unless there are any comments/suggestions. Though
> > this problem exists in previous branches as well, but as there are no field
> > reports and the problem also doesn't appear to be a common problem, so I
> > intend to push only for v16. What do you or others think?
>
> Thanks for the review. I agree that we can push only for V16.
>
Pushed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2023-06-07 06:00:00 | Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums"" |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2023-06-07 05:32:22 | is pg_log_standby_snapshot() really needed? |