Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Date: 2022-09-02 13:40:02
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JuMVWPSCqVmA2-iexH4Rg=4qrMfRANXVgn9Jg3VUUnLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:45 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 7:53 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:33 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Few comments on both the patches:
> > v4-0001*
> > =========
> > 1.
> > Furthermore, if the table uses
> > + <literal>REPLICA IDENTITY FULL</literal>, specifying a column list is not
> > + allowed (it will cause publication errors for <command>UPDATE</command> or
> > + <command>DELETE</command> operations).
> >
> > This line sounds a bit unclear to me. From this like it appears that
> > the following operation is not allowed:
> >
> > postgres=# create table t1(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int);
> > CREATE TABLE
> > postgres=# Alter Table t1 replica identity full;
> > ALTER TABLE
> > postgres=# create publication pub1 for table t1(c1);
> > CREATE PUBLICATION
> >
> > However, what is not allowed is the following:
> > postgres=# delete from t1;
> > ERROR: cannot delete from table "t1"
> > DETAIL: Column list used by the publication does not cover the
> > replica identity.
> >
> > I am not sure if we really need this line but if so then please try to
> > make it more clear. I think the similar text is present in 0002 patch
> > which should be modified accordingly.
> >
>
> The "Furthermore…" sentence came from the commit message [1]. But I
> agree it seems redundant/ambiguous, so I have removed it (and removed
> the same in patch 0002).
>

Thanks, pushed your first patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kazutaka Onishi 2022-09-02 13:43:16 Re: Asynchronous execution support for Custom Scan
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-09-02 13:30:24 Re: pg_auth_members.grantor is bunk