Re: Backpatch b61d161c14 (Introduce vacuum errcontext ...)

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:25 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> >
> > > * The index name is saved only during this phase and restored immediately
> >
> > => I wouldn't say "only" since it's saved during lazy_vacuum: index AND cleanup.
> >
> > >update_vacuum_error_info(LVRelStats *errinfo, LVSavedErrInfo *oldpos, int phase,
> >
> > => You called your struct "LVSavedErrInfo" but the variables are still called
> > "pos". I would call it olderrinfo or just old.
> >
>
> Fixed both of the above comments. I used the variable name as saved_err_info.
>
> > Also, this doesn't (re)rename the "cbarg" stuff that Alvaro didn't like, which
> > was my 0001 patch.
> >
>
> If I am not missing anything then that change was in
> lazy_cleanup_index and after this patch, it won't be required because
> we are using a different variable name.
>
> I have combined both the patches now.
>

I am planning to push this tomorrow if there are no further
suggestions/comments.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com