| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |
| Date: | 2016-06-18 01:29:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Jo7pj1wHHJRgTKj4q1doivpz67tX_jA-iajYXnMtM5mg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partial paths.
>
> Was this supposed to fix the "ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in
> targetlist" problem?
Yes.
>
> If so, it hasn't ...
>
Can you please share why you think so?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-18 01:36:53 | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-18 00:41:54 | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-18 01:36:53 | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-18 00:41:54 | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |