From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |
Date: | 2022-04-12 11:16:28 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JjfmfCz8evCpLx2EVKoH4m8rEgeRciEA7tMkjGx87cyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:17 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > For the second syntax (Alter Publication ...), isn't it better to
> > avoid using ADD? It looks odd to me because we are not adding anything
> > in publication with this sytax.
>
> I was thinking of the scenario where user initially creates the
> publication for all tables:
> CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR ALL TABLES;
>
> After that user decides to skip few tables ex: t1, t2
> ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD SKIP TABLE t1,t2;
>
> I thought of supporting this syntax if incase user decides to add the
> skipping of a few tables later.
>
I understand that part but what I pointed out was that it might be
better to avoid using ADD keyword in this syntax like: ALTER
PUBLICATION pub1 SKIP TABLE t1,t2;
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-04-12 11:26:06 | Re: typos |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-04-12 11:12:29 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |