From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Marco Slot <marco(dot)slot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher |
Date: | 2023-03-16 08:45:11 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JjUKbLZzfSX2p73kfOjSBJzSmV+kYxcCo_Ke5P=fKEYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:12 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 3:18 PM Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
>
> Pushed this patch but forgot to add a new testfile. Will do that soon.
>
The main patch is committed now. I think the pending item in this
thread is to conclude whether we need a storage or subscription to
disable/enable this feature. Both Andres and Onder don't seem to be in
favor but I am of opinion that it could be helpful in scenarios where
the index scan (due to duplicates or dead tuples) is slower. However,
if we don't have a consensus on the same, we can anyway add it later.
If there are no more votes in favor of adding such an option, we can
probably close the CF entry.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2023-03-16 09:03:52 | Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-03-16 08:10:42 | Re: "current directory" in a server error message |