From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Date: | 2021-04-14 02:48:33 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Jesa_G-NOHmV3cCO7Eg=GJt4AWVeFAVyDHoTaq3H-R7Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:04 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I've not looked at the patches yet but as Amit mentioned before[1],
> > it's better to move 0002 patch to after 0004. That is, 0001 patch
> > changes data type to NameData, 0002 patch adds total_txn and
> > total_bytes, and 0003 patch adds regression tests. 0004 patch will be
> > the patch using HTAB (was 0002 patch) and get reviewed after pushing
> > 0001, 0002, and 0003 patches. 0005 patch adds more regression tests
> > for the problem 0004 patch addresses.
>
> I will make the change for this and post a patch for this.
> Currently we have kept total_txns and total_bytes at the beginning of
> pg_stat_replication_slots, I did not see any conclusion on this. I
> preferred it to be at the beginning.
> Thoughts?
>
I prefer those two fields after spill and stream fields. I have
mentioned the same in one of the emails above.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-04-14 03:06:56 | Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2021-04-14 02:45:16 | Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints |