From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com" <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "euler(at)eulerto(dot)com" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com" <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br" <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
Date: | 2023-02-28 08:35:52 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JeBycTHw6rG_Db_9xNWEuK1kCpEAG-2UoMGeaU6TTqaw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 2:21 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
Few comments:
1.
+ /*
+ * If we've requested to shut down, exit the process.
+ *
+ * Note that WalSndDone() cannot be used here because the delaying
+ * changes will be sent in the function.
+ */
+ if (got_STOPPING)
+ {
+ QueryCompletion qc;
+
+ /* Inform the standby that XLOG streaming is done */
+ SetQueryCompletion(&qc, CMDTAG_COPY, 0);
+ EndCommand(&qc, DestRemote, false);
+ pq_flush();
Do we really need to do anything except for breaking the loop and let
the exit handling happen in the main loop when 'got_STOPPING' is set?
AFAICS, this is what we are doing in some other palces (See
WalSndWaitForWal). Won't that work? It seems that will help us sending
all the pending WAL.
2.
+ /* Try to flush pending output to the client */
+ if (pq_flush_if_writable() != 0)
+ WalSndShutdown();
Is there a reason to try flushing here?
Apart from the above, I have made a few changes in the comments in the
attached diff patch. If you agree with those then please include them
in the next version.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
changes_amit_1.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-02-28 08:49:39 | Add documentation for coverage reports with meson |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2023-02-28 08:16:32 | Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode |