| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel worker error |
| Date: | 2017-10-30 02:55:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JbLvcAujSL5O1OJJ=w+RgrKNkJgiFQ2dt9koYc7ESa8g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This patch no longer applies, so attached rebased patches. I have
>> also created patches for v10 as we might want to backpatch the fix.
>> Added the patch in CF (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1342/)
>
> Thanks. I picked the second variant, committed, and also back-patched to 9.6.
>
Thanks. I have closed this entry in CF app, however, I am not sure
what is the best way to deal with the entry present in PostgreSQL 10
Open Items page[1]. The entry for this bug seems to be present in
Older Bugs section. Shall we leave it as it is or do we want to do
something else with it?
[1] - https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_10_Open_Items
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-10-30 03:30:55 | Re: parallelize queries containing initplans |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2017-10-30 02:49:39 | Comment typo |