From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans |
Date: | 2020-03-24 05:24:05 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Jae4E5ioPovQS8Mxj1sYwUcGfpJeFG151fxEi89aN4Wg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:09 AM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Awesome, thanks for confirming with an actual plan.
>
> > I don't think it matters in nontext mode, but at least in text mode, I think
> > maybe the Unfetched blocks should be output after the exact and lossy blocks,
> > in case someone is parsing it, and because bitmap-only is a relatively new
> > feature. Its output is probably less common than exact/lossy.
>
> I tweaked that (and a comment that didn't reference the change); see attached.
>
Few comments:
1.
-
- if (tbmres->ntuples >= 0)
+ else if (tbmres->ntuples >= 0)
node->exact_pages++;
How is this change related to this patch?
2.
+ * unfetched_pages total number of pages not retrieved due to vm
* prefetch_iterator iterator for prefetching ahead of current page
* prefetch_pages # pages prefetch iterator is ahead of current
* prefetch_target current target prefetch distance
@@ -1591,6 +1592,7 @@ typedef struct BitmapHeapScanState
Buffer pvmbuffer;
long exact_pages;
long lossy_pages;
+ long unfetched_pages;
Can we name it as skipped_pages?
3. Can we add a test or two for this functionality?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2020-03-24 05:29:57 | Re: Internal key management system |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-03-24 04:52:49 | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |