From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Date: | 2021-09-04 03:38:15 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JaHrUUTE4vA=J7umwDpmt2C2xDGboWbtO35xwWGdC7NA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 8:54 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:15 AM Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Aug 30, 2021, at 12:06 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've attached rebased patches.
> > For the v12-0003 patch:
> >
> > I believe this feature is needed, but it also seems like a very powerful foot-gun. Can we do anything to make it less likely that users will hurt themselves with this tool?
> >
>
> This won't do any more harm than currently, users can do via
> pg_replication_slot_advance and the same is documented as well, see
> [1].
>
Sorry, forgot to give the link.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-conflicts.html
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-04 04:11:30 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-04 03:24:32 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |