Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare
Date: 2021-03-11 03:58:45
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JZkvN3G+aeQJuk1RdUczRZ3vUoF0mMFNS+S8g2gF8fQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:26 PM Markus Wanner
<markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 10.03.21 11:18, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:14 PM Markus Wanner
> > <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> currently, only the gid is passed on to the filter_prepare callback.
> >> While we probably should not pass a full ReorderBufferTXN (as we do for
> >> most other output plugin callbacks), a bit more information would be
> >> nice, I think.
> >
> > How the proposed 'xid' parameter can be useful? What exactly plugins
> > want to do with it?
>
> The xid is the very basic identifier for transactions in Postgres. Any
> output plugin that interacts with Postgres in any way slightly more
> interesting than "filter by gid prefix" is very likely to come across a
> TransactionId.
>
> It allows for basics like checking if the transaction to decode still is
> in progress, for example.
>

But this happens when we are decoding prepare, so it is clear that the
transaction is prepared, why any additional check?

> Or in a much more complex scenario, decide on
> whether or not to filter based on properties the extension stored during
> processing the transaction.
>

What in this can't be done with GID and how XID can achieve it?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2021-03-11 04:02:00 Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-11 03:37:39 Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)