From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Index Scans |
Date: | 2017-02-16 02:44:28 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JWinUYjWrdicHgWrpRA4jp8wiiRmVEJQOoGrmepJT8Kg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:>
>>> support related patch. In anycase, to avoid confusion I am attaching
>>> all the three patches with this e-mail.
>>
>> Committed guc_parallel_index_scan_v1.patch, with changes to the
>> documentation and GUC descriptions.
>
> And committed parallel_index_opt_exec_support_v10.patch as well, with
> a couple of minor tweaks.
>
Thanks a lot! I think this is a big step forward for parallelism in
PostgreSQL. Now, we have another way to drive parallel scans and I
hope many more queries can use parallelism.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-16 03:04:32 | Re: SCRAM authentication, take three |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-02-16 02:42:33 | Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash |