| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
| Date: | 2014-08-19 11:08:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JWWiaGzqyDGXUg4ahiBSsCBBXLw3wkzN0FMkymV4wjfA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > 1.
> > + Number of parallel connections to perform the operation. This
> > option will enable the vacuum
> > + operation to run on parallel connections, at a time one table
will
> > be operated on one connection.
> >
> > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
> > instead of parallel connections?
>
> I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
Agreed.
>Maybe "simultaneous"?
Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi | 2014-08-19 11:14:47 | Trove with PostgreSQL-XC |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-08-19 10:59:51 | Re: Reporting the commit LSN at commit time |