From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Henry Hinze <henry(dot)hinze(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16643: PG13 - Logical replication - initial startup never finishes and gets stuck in startup loop |
Date: | 2020-11-09 10:54:31 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JWLho8Ghhe0BJTHMt4TB9bG+LNDYpSfUYy0VkL9MLoJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:33 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:50 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 11:33 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, but why do we want to prohibit streaming in tablesync worker
> > unless there is some fundamental reason for the same? If we can write
> > a test based on what I described above then we can probably know if
> > there is any real issue with allowing streaming via tablesync worker.
>
> I think there is no fundamental reason for the same, but I thought it
> is just an initial catchup state so does it make sense to stream the
> transaction. But if we want to stream then we need to put some
> handling in apply_handle_stream_commit so that it can avoid committing
> if this is the table-sync worker.
>
Sure, let's try that then instead of blindly avoid streaming if it is possible.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 德哥 | 2020-11-09 13:49:04 | Re:Re: BUG #16702: inline code and function : when use dynamic name for rowtype, there is some bug! |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-11-09 09:13:10 | BUG #16706: insert into on conflict(pk) do update error violates not-null constraint |