| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Date: | 2022-01-26 02:38:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JVtyHx7jdbGEZh5Dc0k1MjroU51DQX_1geqBJC7GMJQg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:31 AM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:59 AM David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>
> So my more detailed goal would be to get rid of PG_RE_THROW();
>
I don't think that will be possible, consider the FATAL/PANIC error
case. Also, there are reasons why we always restart apply worker on
ERROR even without this work. If we want to change that, we might need
to redesign the apply side mechanism which I don't think we should try
to do as part of this patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-01-26 02:39:16 | Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-01-26 02:28:01 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |