| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ivan Novick <inovick(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Union All View execution |
| Date: | 2015-10-15 07:08:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JQnoxVLeoaqjXv36v_pyXJeBANhgta6adV8Oft-wA5fg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Ivan Novick <inovick(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If we have two queries, Query A and Query B that both return same columns.
>
> If we do Union All View will postgresql execute Query A and then Query B
> sequentially?
>
> Does the work being discussed around parallel query have the potential to
> parallely execute both parts of a Union All View?
>
>
The work being currently done will not cover this case. However,
each individual Query's involved in union could be run in parallel, if
they meet criterial for parallel query (like doesn't use parallel-unsafe
clauses).
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-10-15 07:32:12 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Victor Wagner | 2015-10-15 07:07:40 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |