Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date: 2022-02-16 08:50:10
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JQSm+-yqqFQiMpVE3G7rnPAA8Az_-APG-1qP=zrK=96Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:01 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:46 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Only if either the user wants to drop all stats, or somehow knows the oids of
> > already dropped tables...
>
> If it's really true that we can end up storing data for dropped
> objects, I think that's not acceptable and needs to be fixed.
>

Agreed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-02-16 09:04:14 Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-02-16 08:49:37 Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats