From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FailedAssertion at ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit() |
Date: | 2020-06-10 03:00:15 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JNeaE_rq36GJ6ZST-+xrv2dpw+6-B2n9sLnTwLu6g7Lw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > I wonder if we may
> > need to keep evicting the transactions until we don't exceed
> > memory limit.
> >
>
> Yes, that should be the right fix here.
>
Can you please check whether the attached patch fixes the problem for you?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix_rb_mem_ovfl_1.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-06-10 03:03:49 | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-06-10 02:15:44 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |