Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index
Date: 2017-01-27 02:30:40
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JC40_XDhPcbGe1FMDY9CUhTUcmRXvx_K2ORR2xxRqEHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> On 01/23/2017 02:53 PM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
>>
>> I have done some more testing with this, and have moved to the patch
>> back to 'Needs Review' pending Amit's comments.
>>
>
> Moved to "Ready for Committer".
>

Don't you think we should try to identify the reason of the deadlock
error reported by you up thread [1]? I know that you and Ashutosh are
not able to reproduce it, but still I feel some investigation is
required to find the reason. It is quite possible that the test case
is such that the deadlock is expected in rare cases, if that is the
case then it is okay. I have not spent enough time on that to comment
whether it is a test or code issue.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dc6d7247-050f-4014-8c80-a4ee676eb384%40redhat.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-01-27 02:44:21 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-27 02:26:58 Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch