From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix inconsistencies for v12 |
Date: | 2019-05-30 09:42:32 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J75bin==8mqO1tFs+KCUSHpUS3dck7pRvqqtrpSTi_vA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:30 AM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 28.05.2019 2:05, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 3:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >>> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 2:20 AM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>> 5. ExecContextForcesOids - not changed, but may be should be removed
> >>>> (orphaned after 578b2297)
> >>> Yes, we should remove the use of ExecContextForcesOids.
> >> Unless grep is failing me, ExecContextForcesOids is in fact gone.
> >> All that's left is one obsolete mention in a comment, which should
> >> certainly be cleaned up.
> >>
..
> > */
> I got a coredump with `make installcheck-world` (on postgres_fdw test):
>
Thanks for noticing this. I have run the tests in parallel mode with
something like make -s check-world -j4 PROVE_FLAGS='-j4'. It didn't
stop at failure, so I missed to notice it. However, now looking
carefully (by redirecting the output to a log file), I could see this.
>
> (On a side note, I agree with your remarks regarding 2 and 3; please
> look at a better patch for 3 attached.)
>
The new patch looks good to me. However, instead of committing just
this one alone, I will review others as well and see which all can be
combined and pushed together.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-05-30 09:51:18 | Re: Fix inconsistencies for v12 |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-05-30 07:33:17 | Re: How to know referenced sub-fields of a composite type? |