From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | xu(dot)xw2008(at)163(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18486: Is there something wrong with the calculation in ReorderBufferChangeSize()? |
Date: | 2024-06-04 05:28:52 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J2pO5W0qpoA3r97ijb_K00NoFS0nkKxOjgXuDu=c-4zQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:30 AM PG Bug reporting form
<noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 18486
> Logged by: Xingwang Xu
> Email address: xu(dot)xw2008(at)163(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 17beta1
> Operating system: CentOS7.9
> Description:
>
> In the code related to logical replication, there is a function
> ReorderBufferChangeSize(), which is used to calculate the size of a change
> in memory.
>
> When looking at the ReorderBufferChangeSize() function, I saw the following
> code:
>
> case REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_MESSAGE:
> {
> Size prefix_size = strlen(change->data.msg.prefix) + 1;
>
> sz += prefix_size + change->data.msg.message_size +
> sizeof(Size) + sizeof(Size);
>
> break;
> }
>
> When calculating the change size of the message type, there are two
> “sizeof(Size)” in the code. It is not clear why these two “sizeof(Size)” are
> added and whether these two “sizeof(Size)” are redundant.
>
These two sizeof(Size) are added as while serializing or restoring
message change, we explicitly serialize/restore the size of the prefix
and the actual message. See
ReorderBufferSerializeChange()/ReorderBufferRestoreChange().
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mor Lehr | 2024-06-04 06:39:09 | Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-06-04 05:25:23 | Re: BUG #17947: Combination of replslots pgstat issues causes error/assertion failure |