From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
Date: | 2021-01-25 05:48:41 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+yeLwBCkTvTdPM-hSk1fr6jT8KJc362CN8zrGztq_JqQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:03 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit.
>
> PSA the v19 patch for the Tablesync Solution1.
>
I see one race condition in this patch where we try to drop the origin
via apply process and DropSubscription. I think it can lead to the
error "cache lookup failed for replication origin with oid %u". The
same problem can happen via exposed API pg_replication_origin_drop but
probably because this is not used concurrently so nobody faced this
issue. I think for the matter of this patch we can try to suppress
such an error either via try..catch, or by adding missing_ok argument
to replorigin_drop API, or we can just add to comments that such a
race exists. Additionally, we should try to start a new thread for the
existence of this problem in pg_replication_origin_drop. What do you
think?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | yuzuko | 2021-01-25 06:10:56 | Re: Release SPI plans for referential integrity with DISCARD ALL |
Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-01-25 05:37:29 | RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...) |