From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Index Scans |
Date: | 2017-01-27 02:13:23 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+wPGUrHCfx=uXCs29NWiZuu62a8uGngayCONzug1V-hA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Haribabu Kommi
>> <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > I didn't find any better names other than the following,
>> >
>> > _bt_get_next_parallel_page
>> > _bt_set_next_parallel_page
>> >
>>
>> I am not sure using *_next_* here will convey the message because for
>> backward scans we set the last page. I am open to changing the names
>> of functions if committer and or others prefer the names suggested by
>> you.
>
>
> OK. I am fine with it.
> I don't have any other comments on the patch.
>
Thanks for the review.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-27 02:23:18 | Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-27 01:53:44 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |