From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajendra Kumar Dangwal <dangwalrajendra888(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, euler(at)eulerto(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |
Date: | 2024-11-06 06:25:04 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+wKxECWE1P4U=-ibMhis85j8FdtNL2gcDMvNMnpMof5w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:35 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am observing some unexpected errors with the following scenario.
>
You are getting an expected ERROR. It is because of the design of
logical decoding which relies on historic snapshots.
> ======
> Tables:
>
> Publisher table:
> test_pub=# create table t1 (a int, b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) STORED);
> CREATE TABLE
> test_pub=# insert into t1 values (1);
> INSERT 0 1
>
> ~
>
> And Subscriber table:
> test_sub=# create table t1(a int, b int);
> CREATE TABLE
>
> ======
> TEST PART 1.
>
> I create 2 publications, having different parameter values.
>
> test_pub=# create publication pub1 for table t1 with
> (publish_generated_columns=true);
> CREATE PUBLICATION
> test_pub=# create publication pub2 for table t1 with
> (publish_generated_columns=false);
> CREATE PUBLICATION
>
> ~
>
> And I try creating a subscription simultaneously subscribing to both
> of these publications. This fails with an expected error.
>
> test_sub=# create subscription sub1 connection 'dbname=test_pub'
> publication pub1, pub2;
> ERROR: cannot use different column lists for table "public.t1" in
> different publications
>
> ======
> TEST PART 2.
>
> Now on publisher set parameter for pub2 to be true;
>
> test_pub=# alter publication pub2 set (publish_generated_columns);
> ALTER PUBLICATION
> test_pub=# \dRp+
> Publication pub1
> Owner | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via
> root | Genera
> ted columns
> ----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-------
> ------------
> postgres | f | t | t | t | t | f | t
> Tables:
> "public.t1"
>
> Publication pub2
> Owner | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via
> root | Genera
> ted columns
> ----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-------
> ------------
> postgres | f | t | t | t | t | f | t
> Tables:
> "public.t1"
>
> ~
>
> Now the create subscriber works OK.
>
> test_sub=# create subscription sub1 connection 'dbname=test_pub'
> publication pub1,pub2;
> NOTICE: created replication slot "sub1" on publisher
> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
>
> ======
> TEST PART 3.
>
> Now on Publisher let's alter that parameter back to false again...
>
> test_pub=# alter publication pub2 set (publish_generated_columns=false);
> ALTER PUBLICATION
>
> And insert some data.
>
> test_pub=# insert into t1 values (2);
> INSERT 0 1
>
> ~
>
> Now the subscriber starts failing again...
>
> ERROR: cannot use different values of publish_generated_columns for
> table "public.t1" in different publications
> etc...
>
> ======
> TEST PART 4.
>
> Finally, on the Publisher alter that parameter back to true again!
>
> test_pub=# alter publication pub2 set (publish_generated_columns);
> ALTER PUBLICATION
...
>
>
> ~~
>
> Unfortunately, even though the publication parameters are the same
> again, the subscription seems to continue forever failing....
>
> ERROR: cannot use different values of publish_generated_columns for
> table "public.t1" in different publications
>
The reason is that the failing 'insert' uses a historic snapshot,
which has a catalog state where 'publish_generated_columns' is still
false. So, you are seeing that error repeatedly. This behavior exists
from the very beginning of logical replication and another issue due
to the same reason was reported recently [1] which is actually a setup
issue. We should improve this situation some day but it is not the
responsibility of this patch.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18683-a98f79c0673be358%40postgresql.org
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wenhui qiu | 2024-11-06 06:32:16 | Re: optimize the value of vacthresh and anlthresh |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-11-06 06:05:00 | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |