From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant |
Date: | 2017-11-21 14:26:11 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+qNuT2iY+gL-yi-Sn-aj=2y7hBD3GFFRrxh6hV-U+X6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I was looking through the indexes code I got confused by couple of
> macros - IndexTupleSize() and IndexTupleDSize() - which seem to do the same
> thing with only difference that the first one takes pointer as an argument
> while the second one takes struct. And in most cases IndexTupleDSize() is
> used with dereferencing of index tuple where IndexTupleSize() would suit
> perfectly. Is there a particular reason to have them both? I've made a patch
> that removes IndexTupleDSize macro. All the tests have passed.
>
+1. I was also once confused with these macros. I think this is a
good cleanup. On a quick look, I don't see any problem with your
changes.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-11-21 14:45:37 | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-21 13:59:43 | Re: feature request: consume asynchronous notification via a function |