| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error |
| Date: | 2021-12-09 04:09:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+pVmSgPDgarBJszv61e-jeONAA5yctg-BeR4HF_Fi_0A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 9:22 PM Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 8, 2021, at 5:10 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I think if we are really worried about transient errors then probably
> > the idea "disable only if the same error has occurred more than X
> > times" seems preferable as compared to taking a decision on which
> > error_codes fall in the transient error category.
>
> No need. We can revisit this design decision in a later release cycle if the current patch's design proves problematic in the field.
>
So, do you agree that we can disable the subscription on any error if
this parameter is set?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-12-09 04:58:24 | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
| Previous Message | Neha Sharma | 2021-12-09 03:12:59 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |