| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typos in comments and user docs |
| Date: | 2020-02-06 11:13:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+pNaW+bpj65Y1aXr6zfxDCqK58K=6XFpuspR6fa9s3QQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:47:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Your changes look fine to me on the first read. I will push this to
> > HEAD unless there are any objections. If we want them in
> > back-branches, we might want to probably segregate the changes based
> > on the branch until those apply.
>
> +1. It would be nice to back-patch the user-visible changes in the
> docs.
>
Fair enough, Justin, is it possible for you to segregate the changes
that can be backpatched?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2020-02-06 11:33:00 | Re: typo in set_rel_consider_parallel() |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-02-06 11:11:36 | Re: typo in set_rel_consider_parallel() |