From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alik Khilazhev <a(dot)khilazhev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench |
Date: | 2017-07-10 07:54:20 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+m4T3yOXncoKUmroiRhrJJC+zz_7BvkT0=0nfhZhwFtQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Alik Khilazhev <a(dot)khilazhev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
> wrote:
> Hello, Fabien!
>
> Your description is not very precise. What version of Postgres is used? If
> there is a decline, compared to which version? Is there a link to these
> results?
>
>
> Benchmark have been done in master v10. I am attaching image with results:
> .
>
>
It will be interesting to see what the profiling data with perf says about
this for PostgreSQL. Can you try to get the perf report?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-07-10 09:28:13 | Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-07-10 07:15:28 | Re: New partitioning - some feedback |