Re: SegFault on 9.6.14

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Date: 2019-11-27 02:22:49
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+kc9-qbuPMeAtyXpjbeCNEB96cbArXhtao=UWxVNEuMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I have modified the commit message as proposed above and additionally
> > added comments in nodeLimit.c. I think we should move ahead with this
> > bug-fix patch. If we don't like the comment, it can anyway be
> > improved later.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
>
> If there are no further suggestions or objections, I will commit this
> early next week, probably on Monday.
>

Yesterday, I pushed this patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-11-27 02:34:26 Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-11-27 02:03:34 Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?