| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
| Date: | 2014-11-24 03:29:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+fN9ebgw80=Po9Z+t9S9bMi=qTvBhNAmT_BEEic1GM+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 23 November 2014 14:45, Amit Kapila Wrote
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for debugging and fixing the issue..
>
>
>
> Latest patch is attached, please have a look.
>
I think still some of the comments given upthread are not handled:
a. About cancel handling
b. Setting of inAbort flag for case where PQCancel is successful
c. Performance data of --analyze-in-stages switch
d. Have one pass over the comments in patch. I could still some
wrong multiline comments. Refer below:
+ /* Otherwise, we got a stage from vacuum_all_databases(), so run
+ * only that one. */
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2014-11-24 06:07:37 | Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly |
| Previous Message | Dilip kumar | 2014-11-24 02:04:09 | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |