Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)
Date: 2017-05-29 10:00:47
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+fGw7HEpaUGskF2C2yFWVfCouK3OXpZ=NhYqgQ1dp+4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > I think the real question here is, shall we backpatch this fix or we
>> > want to do this just in Head or we want to consider it as a new
>> > feature for PostgreSQL-11. I think it should be fixed in Head and the
>> > change seems harmless to me, so we should even backpatch it.
>>
>> The thing is not invasive, so backpatching is a low-risk move. We can
>> as well get that into HEAD first, wait a bit for dust to settle on it,
>> and then backpatch.
>
>
>
> I would definitely suggest putting it in HEAD (and thus, v10) for a while to
> get some real world exposure before backpatching.
>

make sense to me, so I have added an entry in "Older Bugs" section in
PostgreSQL 10 Open Items.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-29 10:19:56 Re: pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory
Previous Message Andrew Borodin 2017-05-29 09:53:37 Re: Allow GiST opcalsses without compress\decompres functions