Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-12-27 06:58:25
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+dmGNTFMnLO4EbOWJDHUq=+a2L8T=72ifXeh-Kd8HOsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I'll review after that, since I have other things to review meanwhile.
>>>
>>> Attached, please find the rebased patch attached with this e-mail.
>>> There is no fundamental change in patch except for adapting the new
>>> locking strategy in squeeze operation. I have done the sanity testing
>>> of the patch with master-standby setup and Kuntal has helped me to
>>> verify it with his wal-consistency checker patch.
>>
>> This patch again needs a rebase,
>>
>
> I had completed it yesterday night and kept it for night long tests to
> check the sanity of the patch, but I guess now I need another rebase.
>

After recent commit's 7819ba1e and 25216c98, this patch requires a
rebase. Attached is the rebased patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
wal_hash_index_v7.patch application/octet-stream 129.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-12-27 07:41:16 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-12-27 05:31:36 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables