From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Date: | 2016-07-29 14:01:40 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+c-Gyz5EEd_Bu5JZRdzJ1hXfWnWfmktxCX3RGk7n63Gw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I think there is some value in providing
>> .tar for -Z 0,
>
> I was thinking that "-Ft -Z0" is something like an alias of "-Ft".
> That is, the backup is taken in uncompressed tar format.
>
>> however in that case how should we define usage of -F p
>> -Z 0? Shall we say with plain format -Z 0 gets ignored or throw error
>> or do something else? If first, then I think it is better to mention
>> the same in docs.
>
> ISTM that it's better to ignore that case, like pg_dump -Ft -Z0
> doesn't throw an error.
>
Okay, then you can go ahead with your patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-07-29 14:18:10 | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-07-29 13:17:02 | Re: "Strong sides of MySQL" talk from PgDay16Russia, translated |