From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hash Indexes |
Date: | 2016-10-28 04:33:16 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+aoV5HzXh8BLyVdBiSJyo-OytZrOr7WcV7u7KLWD6rwg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Amit, can you please split the buffer manager changes in this patch
>>> into a separate patch?
>>
>> Sure, attached patch extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v1.patch does that.
>
> The additional argument to ConditionalLockBuffer() doesn't seem to be
> used anywhere in the main patch. Do we actually need it?
>
No, with latest patch of concurrent hash index, we don't need it. I
have forgot to remove it. Please find updated patch attached. The
usage of second parameter for ConditionalLockBuffer() is removed as we
don't want to allow I/O across content locks, so the patch is changed
to fallback to twice locking the metapage.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-28 04:55:15 | Applying XLR_INFO_MASK correctly when looking at WAL record information |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-10-28 03:55:22 | Re: save redundant code for pseudotype I/O functions |