| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
| Date: | 2020-03-31 09:31:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+ZryD3mCYVSmrLOmc8fw-oL0UZkDm2oUwQNQNax4KvJQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 4. Currently, we are combining all full-page write
> force/normal/consistency checks in one category. I am not sure
> whether it will be good information to know how many are force_fpw and
> how many are normal_fpw?
>
We can do it if we want but I am not sure how useful it will be. I
think we can always enhance this information if people really need
this and have a clear use-case in mind.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2020-03-31 09:59:50 | Re: recovery_target_action=pause with confusing hint |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-03-31 09:26:07 | Re: backup manifests |